Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02643
Original file (BC 2014 02643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02643

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect she contributed to the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program (VEAP).  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, block 15.a, erroneously indicate that she did not contribute to VEAP.  However, she recalls having a monthly deduction from her military pay.  Although she discovered it years ago, it was not until she received a legible copy of her DD Form 214 that she was able to read the error.  As a veteran, she knows that education is one of her benefits.  She has incurred a huge educational debt for which she may be entitled to have some of these expenses reimbursed.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 7 May 1985.  

On 6 February 1993, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with seven years and nine months of active service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  VEAP was enacted by Congress to provide a veteran’s education benefit for individuals entering active duty between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985.  VEAP was a voluntary program that offered a maximum $8,100 benefit to participants.  To enroll and participate, officers and airmen were required to start an allotment or make a deposit at the local accounting and finance office sometime between 1 January 1977 and 31 March 1987.  The minimum amount was $25 and all VEAP contributions were reflected on a leave and earning statement and on quarterly VEAP statements.  Individuals entering active duty during the VEAP era completed a DD Form 2057, Contributory Educational Assistance Program—Statement of Understanding, after receiving a VEAP briefing at Officer Training School or Basic Military Training.  Although, the applicant contends she enrolled in VEAP; there is no evidence to support her claim.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 November 2014 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  While the applicant contends she contributed monthly to VEAP, she has provided no documentary evidence which supports her assertion.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02643 in Executive Session on 31 March 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 June 2014.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 22 August 2014.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 November 2014.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00706

    Original file (BC 2013 00706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00706 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed his $2,200 contribution to the Post-Vietnam Veterans’ Education Assistance Program (VEAP). Participants in VEAP could stop, restart, increase, and decrease the allotment only while serving on active duty. Accordingly, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00497

    Original file (BC 2014 00497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00497 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to reflect that he contributed to the Post- Vietnam Era Veterans Education Program (VEAP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01605

    Original file (BC-2011-01605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    38 USC Chapter 32 - Post-Vietnam ERA Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), Section 3201 was authorized to provide educational assistance to those men and women who entered the Armed Forces after 31 Dec 76, and before 1 Jul 85 and provided that they shall have the right to enroll in the educational benefits program provided by this Chapter at any time during such person's service on active duty before 1 Jul 85. In reaching our determination, we note the applicant’s stated request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02326

    Original file (BC 2013 02326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 15a Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program, be amended to reflect “YES.” ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not aware of the requirement to transfer education benefits while on active duty nor was she counseled on the TEB process prior to retirement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01012

    Original file (BC-2012-01012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as indicated below: 1. On 19 Jan 82, the applicant completed the DD Form 2057, which informed her of criteria for participation in the VEAP. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00826

    Original file (BC-2007-00826.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although he indicated that he elected to participate in the program via Part II of the DD Form 2057, the applicant never initiated an allotment to contribute. As such, he was never enrolled in the program. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01283

    Original file (BC-2008-01283.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would also have been advised of the requirements of the law that if he elected to participate in the conversion; the $2,700 was to be paid within 18 months from accepting the conversion. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05749

    Original file (BC 2013 05749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05749 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) reflect “Yes” rather than “No.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He contributed to VEAP. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01839

    Original file (BC-2006-01839.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01839 INDEX CODE: 100.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 December 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Veteran’s Education Assistance Program (VEAP), contributed $2,700.00 in the program, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00340

    Original file (BC-2005-00340.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    While assigned to USMTM, he never received any information or was required to sign any notification of acceptance/denial informing him that Congress had approved a new window for VEAP conversion (7 March 2001 through 31 October 2001). No one from the Education office informed them of the VEAP conversion. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, the Board is not persuaded relief should be granted.